|
Date:__________________
Name: _________________________________________________________
Mentoring Committee:
Department chair: _________________________________________
Chair of mentoring group: ___________________________________
Third mentor: _____________________________________________
Rate the following items on a 1 - 5 scale to assess the extent to which the mentoring process over the last year or two has accomplished various goals:
5 = Mentoring was highly beneficial
4 = Mentoring was beneficial
3 = Mentoring was beneficial to a limited degree
2 = Mentoring did not address this point
1 = I asked for help on this but was not satisfied with the result
___Receiving a general orientation to the College and life in Gambier
___Obtaining basic knowledlge of what it means to be a faculty member
___Receiving help with professional writing or artistic productivity
___Setting career goals/ time-lines
___Time management
___Selecting educational or research projects
___Balancing personal and professional priorities
___Learning about Kenyon's organizational structure, piorities, politics, culture
___Learning about the culture of my department
___Fostering effective professional relationships in and outside the College
___Pedagogical approaches
___Managing students in class (advice about grading, extensions, plagiarism, etc.)
___The role of academic advisor to students
___Preparation for the pre-tenure review (e.g.,advice about the prospectus, etc.)
Others - Please list:
1. How often were your classes visted by your mentors?
2. Describe the quantity and nature of contacts with your mentors.
3. How useful were the year-end meetings and the mentoring report at the end of the first year?
4. How could your experience of being mentored have been improved?
Please return this form to Associate Provost Paula Turner,
Edelstein House, by June 15.
/jep 08/06
|
